Résultats & Replay NTW3

Non je ne parle de cette bataille ennuyante de mon côté, mais de celle où nous sommes avec Chrome.

Je t'ai plusieurs fois entendu dire en bataille ;c'est n'importe quoi, on jouait pas comme ça ... Suite à des actions de jeu litigieuses .

Kettch a écrit:Dans la partie où Seimour "ragesuicidequit" , les micro freezes incessants font foirer pas mal de mes déploiements ( dont un essentiel qui pourrait faire disparaitre Melet au moment de l'attaque de cav) sous le feu des leichte infanterie (avec en plus des unités qui se mettent à la perpendiculaire toutes seules)

[Grognard]_Seimour a écrit:

La performance de Clem dans la partie est médiocre à souhait et j'ai l'impression qu'il fait exprès.

[Grognard]_Marbot a écrit:Frog perd assez vite contre le Français, et là c'est le drame, Wally drop ...   , je venais tout juste de finir les 3 quarts du Portugais, mais c'est quand on pense que tout est perdu qu'en fait tout est possible.   .

[Vélite]_Why-Not a écrit:

[Grognard]_Seimour a écrit:

[Vélite]_Why-Not a écrit:

Mes pertes sont artificiellement augmenté de 350 par la fin de partie quand le reste de l'équipe s'immobilise devant les restes de Gaius alors que je pousse.

• All of your cavalry was sent in frontal charges in thick columns allowing our smaller and weaker units to use their numbers more effectively and negating your number advantage(always stretch your cavalry in lines before charging)
  
• You were in greater number but divided your cavalry over several units and went in waves which further negated your advantage
  
• You didn't notice I was packing a KGL dragoon which might have 67 men but has better stats than a french cuirassier and thus utterly destroyed all of your dragoons.
  

[Grognard]_Seimour a écrit:I agree with you except for the bit about the initial cavalry battle. You lost the cavalry battle for the following reasons:

• All of your cavalry was sent in frontal charges in thick columns allowing our smaller and weaker units to use their numbers more effectively and negating your number advantage(always stretch your cavalry in lines before charging)
  
• You were in greater number but divided your cavalry over several units and went in waves which further negated your advantage
  
• You didn't notice I was packing a KGL dragoon which might have 67 men but has better stats than a french cuirassier and thus utterly destroyed all of your dragoons.
  

A. Guillet a écrit:

[Grognard]_Seimour a écrit:I agree with you except for the bit about the initial cavalry battle. You lost the cavalry battle for the following reasons:

• All of your cavalry was sent in frontal charges in thick columns allowing our smaller and weaker units to use their numbers more effectively and negating your number advantage(always stretch your cavalry in lines before charging)
  
• You were in greater number but divided your cavalry over several units and went in waves which further negated your advantage
  
• You didn't notice I was packing a KGL dragoon which might have 67 men but has better stats than a french cuirassier and thus utterly destroyed all of your dragoons.
  

 

[Grognard]_Melet a écrit:

A. Guillet a écrit:

[Grognard]_Seimour a écrit:I agree with you except for the bit about the initial cavalry battle. You lost the cavalry battle for the following reasons:

• All of your cavalry was sent in frontal charges in thick columns allowing our smaller and weaker units to use their numbers more effectively and negating your number advantage(always stretch your cavalry in lines before charging)
  
• You were in greater number but divided your cavalry over several units and went in waves which further negated your advantage
  
• You didn't notice I was packing a KGL dragoon which might have 67 men but has better stats than a french cuirassier and thus utterly destroyed all of your dragoons.
  

 

It's really important to come on ts, otherwise nobody wanna play with you . You decide something and do it without a word to your allied . sometimes it s quite boring . Believe me my friend .

A. Guillet a écrit:

[Grognard]_Melet a écrit:

A. Guillet a écrit:

[Grognard]_Seimour a écrit:I agree with you except for the bit about the initial cavalry battle. You lost the cavalry battle for the following reasons:

• All of your cavalry was sent in frontal charges in thick columns allowing our smaller and weaker units to use their numbers more effectively and negating your number advantage(always stretch your cavalry in lines before charging)
  
• You were in greater number but divided your cavalry over several units and went in waves which further negated your advantage
  
• You didn't notice I was packing a KGL dragoon which might have 67 men but has better stats than a french cuirassier and thus utterly destroyed all of your dragoons.
  

 

It's really important to come on ts, otherwise nobody wanna play with you . You decide something and do it without a word to your allied . sometimes it s quite boring . Believe me my friend .

I don t try to tell you any order but your way of playing make lot of write about you .

you don t speak English and i don t too . but few words as "Watch your cav", "come on help me", ae so important that you need to be on ts .

Believe me plz .

Melet Dear friend, I do not speak English and French. I was in TS when I was in the CER, but not needed. Just write at the beginning of the battle, what do you want, on your own or follow the orders of your general, or the more experienced player. Watch this battle that I fought with DA Motta. I wrote what I wanted to do at first, then nothing more ....... Element is too attached that to win you need to be on TS.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQ8QozMKS0E&list=PLrlglSAW5MWQXGynVY2A-K54upqgXHqVY